As a person that deals in way to much reality, expeditions, hanging from rock walls and hanging out with bears and other wild critters, I am amazed at the intellectual rigidness of people and their agenda’s. Reality is a beautiful thing people, embrace it and your life and the life of others would be subjected to so much less drama.
As we look at the realm of reality we see obvious challenges. There are few absolutes in life or in wildlife management. There are plenty of exceptions though. And some are glaring exceptions to this reality rule! Reality and the rule of absolutes collide in the many areas of public policy. Agenda’s are followed without the slightest glance towards reality. When policy decisions are based on political agenda’s great harm is caused. All policy decisions must be based on situational awareness, research and knowledge of the given situation.
Back to intellectual rigidness. As most people that know me can attest, I can be swayed with fact and data that can be substantiated and that I can understand. If you bring me the quantum physics explanation of why cow pies are different from bison pies based on the density of whatever, I will probably want to turn to another channel. Bring me a logical argument with data to support this stance and if it is based on science and logic I will be swayed to this position. Illogical assertions, or the ‘I feel this way’, will not sway me. That is not intellectual or informational and does not help in solving a problem or focusing clarity on a subject. It is personal opinion and we know what people say about personal opinion. In the overall debate it is also not helpful as these attitudes harden the positions of others on the side that disagrees. Openness and intellectual fluidity, not rigidity is needed in these times and for the issues that we all wish to solve. Now, how do these theoretical concepts impact on a real world of animal issues?
For the sake of clarity we will focus on one animal that is at the peak of its popularity to some and is a lightning rod for the folks on the other side of the issue. This latter group, mostly hunters, ranchers and states rights constitutionalists, believe that the wolf, grey’s, timbers, reds and Mexican, should be regulated by states with no interference from the federal government. On both sides of this battle, positions have hardened and a great deal of misinformation is spread and accepted as truth. One very serious and disconcerting problem to me is that intelligent people, on both sides, that will not accept the truths of this situation based on solid research and observed behaviors. In this article we will delve into some of these issues and hopefully repair some of the gulfs that have pushed this wolf war to ridiculous and truly pathetic levels.
Wolves, wow is that a loaded word. People either love them or hate them, little middle ground here. Glad that I picked bears to study and research as almost everyone loves bears. Who could dislike a teddy bear, a panda or a koala? Not really a bear but we will take credit for this loveable little critter. Everyone knows the story of Little Red Riding Hood, watched countless movies of wolves eating everything in sight and read children’s books that vilify wolves. Bears are even seen positively in commercials, not the wolf. Why is this?
Simple, wolves are as good as humans at killing and many resent the competition. Wolves kill the same wild things that we eat and many resent the competition. Wolves kill the same animals that we guide to hunt and many do not like the competition. Wolves eat beef and sheep and many resent the competition. Only problem is that the wolf does it 24/7/365, and again simply put, the wolf killings have more or equal impact then the effects of hunters that do not want to share the bounty. Simple, but these are the straight unaltered and indisputable truths. Talk to any hunter, rancher, trapper, or person that believes wolves should be hunted to extinction and this is the common denominator of the argument, they are better than us. A bit of envy and jealousy here, totally.
Does this mean that wolves are just wonderful and need to be allowed to roam and breed as they dictate; no way on God’s green earth should that happen. They are ruthless, completely efficient and bloodthirsty killers. Just as they should be as this is how they have evolved over the centuries, efficient animals that learned how to live off the land and have become the top predator in the field, even better than humans in that wilderness arena.
On both sides of the debate, or should I call it what it really is, a complete inability to grasp and the willingness to accept that wonderful concept, reality. How about intellectual honesty to! Ooops, hope I did not step on any toes there!
On the pro-wolf side I have heard some of the dumbest touchy feely crap that could spew out of the mouths of intelligent people. How about this one, ‘I have a dog-wolf hybrid and he is a loving and caring dog’. He never attacks other dogs, people or even a moose calf when we are in Montana. I can assure you that Muffy is mostly DOG—- genetically and personality wise, and many if not all of those wolf traits have been lost many generations ago. This one is one of my all time favorites, ‘they have such penetrating and kind eyes’. In your dog/wolf that is true. My 120 pound chocolate lab had these same eyes, warm and friendly. When I am with wild wolves that penetrating stare is neither kind.or friendly. It is sizing me up and seeing if I am a threat or a benign visitor in his home range. Sometimes I wonder if that gaze is not looking at me thinking about a dinner that I might provide. In the field I have never been bothered by a wolf and feel very fortunate to have been as close as I have been to these magnificent animals. I am also very weary of them as I am with all large critters that I observe and research. Another misconception by the pro-wolf people is that, ‘wolves only cull the weak, sick and old from a herd’. Along with healthy cows and bulls and calves in the spring drop. In some caribou, elk and moose populations the kill rate of calves is over 70% from both wolves and bears. Some of these herds have collapsed due to this over depredation.
If you do not believe these figures talk with people in the USFWS in Alaska and the NPS biologists in Yellowstone NP. In 1991 elk populations were exceeding 22,000, now in the northern herd there are possibly 7,000 animals. Wolves and bears are part of the reason for this decline. Other factors are drought, heavy winter snows in some years and disease and, of course, hunting. . In the coming month I will be posting a study that I am conducting on the carrying capacity of wolves in Yellowstone based completely on historical records of elk populations. The study will consider many factors about the decline of elk numbers and should answer some of the questions about animal predation and elk numbers.
As a point of pure information on the dining habits of wolves in Yellowstone, wolves take down 1.8 elk per month on the average and their diets are composed of 83% elk. These figures are based on 2009 NPS research, records and studies. Now back to wolf issues.
Wolves do have a serious impact, at times, on the healthy nature of an ecosystem; sometimes they are incredibly positive and not so wonderful at other times. Balance needs to be maintained and sometimes mother nature is a bit slow at figuring this out. In a non-politically charged atmosphere our state and federal environmental agencies generally do a great job at making decisions about these complex issues. Just have to keep politics out and science in charge here.
Wolves never kill people. False, they do, although it is an extremely rare occurrence. You have a much greater chance of being clubbed to death by some right wing wolf hater than being eaten by a wolf. Why did I say this in such a manner? To make a point to both sides of the wolf war issue! In March of 2009 near Chignik Lake, Alaska, Candice Berner was killed by 4 wolves while running on a dirt road in the area. Kenton Carnegie in November of 2005 was found dead near Prince Albert, Saskatchewan. Autopsy indicated a black bear could have caused this death but a complete investigation and coroner’s jury determined that wolves were the animals involved. The bears were exonerated in this attack. A third fatality, Vladimir Paschkov was attacked and killed by wolves in the Ural Mountain Region of Russia. This february 2009 incident in Siklyatz Duvanskogo was witnessed by four others that went to his defense and were also injured. In the case of Candice Berner, four wolves were identified and shot. These were found to be healthy animals after necropsies were performed. These are not the only ones that I found while researching this article. In Russia this seems to be more common than in North America. I did not report on these others as the information seemed a bit sketchier. It does happen and these cases indicate that it does happen and will in the future. Wolves are carnivores and at times we, humans, become dinner.
There are other areas that are irritating to the anti-wolf people. These are some of the good ones that I have had to explain. I sure wish that the wolf lovers would see wolves in a more realistic way and accept them for what they are, really cool, fantastic, wonderful and beautiful animals that have become some of the most fear predators in the animal kingdom. They are efficient and effective in doing what genetics and nature calls of them. That is the true nature of the wolf, not Muffy sitting on your couch.
How do you start and where on the issues of the anti-wolf people. How about we nuke the National Parks and allow cows and sheep to destroy what wise men before you have protected. Remember John Muir! Besides being a really good mountaineer, this I like about him, he had a sinister side. He used to graze sheep in the high Sierra of California. After a number of years of causing havoc he accessed his negative impact and in 1892, the by then conservationist and preservationist, founded the Sierra Club. He understood the economic reasons of why we graze animals but also understood that the land we live and work on is borrowed. He saw the need to protect certain aspects of our natural world so others could enjoy these places. We own this to our children and to their children. Too many in the anti-wolf element believe it is theirs to trample and use and abuse as they see fit, without a thought as to the future. I will also add here that wolves are not the only ones that are being eradicated in a callous and immoral way. Bears, in Alaska, are being snared and trapped and then killed in similar numbers to wolves. As the founder of Bears Unlimited I find this very troublesome.
Now lets look at a few of the issues that need to be discussed and just maybe some of the anti-wolf people will see this in a little more rational manner. How about their assertion that on public leased pasture their animals need to be safe from attack by wolves, bears or fairy princess’s. On your private land you can do and demand anything that you choose to do. If wolves come on your land to dine on a nice steak dinner I have no problem with you shooting them as this, I believe, is your right. On public lands, my land, I do not want you shooting, wolves, coyotes, bears or really anything else unless you have a legal hunting permit to do this. I suspect that many in the pro and anti-wolf camp would agree with this.
I do understand your problems, cows are money and you send your kids to school, buy cars and pay bills with this money. It is your living and you have every right to pursue this way of life. I also understand the serious economic impact that losing cattle can have on a smaller operation. Let us say if you have 100 cows and each is worth $1000.00 Have 10 killed by wolves and you have lost about a tenth of your income. That is substantial and I do believe that you have a right to protect your investment and your ability to make a living. Now, how do we all get together and solve this issue. Some form of dependable and fair compensation needs to be instituted again or do not graze on public lands until you are willing to accept the concept of taking care of your cattle, your investment. Compensation is a solution but this has to be coupled with a certain casualty rate and realization that this is multiple use property. Combat is tough sometimes. We had a system before with the Defenders of Wildlife so it can be done. In this equation ranchers have to be able to show that they are taking actions to protect their cattle that are killed by wolves. Cannot just throw them out on public land and gripe when they are eaten by the wrong species. The pro-wolf side has to understand that certain wolves prefer the easy kill of a cow and these wolves need to be taken out of the equation. Some compromise and acceptance of reality on both sides in understanding these issues will go along way to solving this problem.
The problem with the wolf decimating elk, caribou and moose populations is not that difficult to understand. If the balance of nature is way out of whack we need to take actions to try to stabilize these conditions.
Here is the difficult part. The people that should be formulating these policies should be researchers, land managers, animal behaviorists, and scientists that have solid credentials in wildlife work. Many of these individuals can and should be people that have vast amounts of wildlife experience and not necessarily a college degree. Educations can be found in many places, the forest being a place of great learning. These people need to be open minded and not appointed as political hacks. Policy should be based on science not politics or agenda’s. There are times that the level of all predators is excessive and at other times the prey population is well over capacity for an ecosystem. Both sides have to understand that nature is not perfect or precise and unfortunately needs to be helped at times. Let’s just do this for the right reasons, the betterment of all animals in the forest.
The issue before us now, 2011, is a nasty one that really does not make me happy. I find it pathetic and disgusting that a party would not be willing to openly debate an important issue but is perfectly willing to attach this to another that would make it difficult to reject, a government funding bill. By subterfuge this action will happen and this should sicken all that have defended this country, even supporters on the anti-wolf side. It is a deplorable way to do business and it will be avenged. Republicans should know this as the groundswell will engulf your cowardly tactics in the coming elections. We, all of us, have an obligation to work together as, Americans, and as a people that cherishes its democratic traditions. This cowardly action is against these traditions.
I suspect that many on both sides of this issue share my opinion of this usurpation of our rights to debate, openly, fairly and with class and integrity. We should all be saddened and sickened by this action. I know this Marine is!
This article was not written to inflame or to see the issue from a neutral position. It was written to produce some interior soul searching and exterior passion but passion tinged with thought and honesty. It was written to allow people to see the other side and to offer a few basic ideas at how we bridge our differences. We cannot kill everything that we do not like or understand nor can we love everything out of misplaced compassion and or the lack of compassion for a family trying to make a living doing what they love. Ranchers and hunters are vilified as are environmentalist and preservationists. We should all be on the same side, the side of leaving a wilderness for our children and a legacy for this world that people and animals can exist on the same planet.
Mingo Morvin
Founder Bears Unlimited Inc.
Bearsunlimitedinc.org